Author: Ken Dibble
Posted: 2015-06-20 at 19:28:47
>There is however encryption that takes an infeasibly long time to
>crack using known math - and not a lot of new math gets invented.
>That of course assumes that all your other precautions are as good
>as your encryption!
Infeasible on one computer today. On a distributed network of, say,
10,000 bots, each running dual-core processors at 3.5 GHz with 4 GB
of RAM? Perhaps no so much, if a criminal network decides it would be
worth the investment.
In any case, if time is all you're counting on, I'd say that's a bad
bet, because the time it takes a computer to execute an instruction
keeps getting shorter and shorter, at a very regular and rapid pace.
Ken Dibble
www.stic-cil.org
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/D9.50.26923.62506855@cdptpa-oedge02
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.