Re: Runtime Filename VFP5.0a

Author: Allen

Posted: 2011-09-23 at 05:06:41

I never had the problem in 5. It was 6 that caused all my problems

Al

-----Original Message-----

On 9/22/11 3:33 PM, Dan Covill wrote:

> There was one BIG difference in VFP6. It pretty much worked, which was

> not true of 5.

VFP5 was known affectionately by me as VFPc5 ;)

Although IIRC the c0000005 fatal errors didn't mostly go away until VFP7.

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CFEEF53382B344CBAB31827CE7CCF8E8@gslredacer

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2011 Allen