Re: PROTECTING YOUR DISTRIBUTED CODE (was Re: Using a common class from another EXE/DLL)

Author: Stephen Russell

Posted: 2016-12-02 at 14:14:31

I was keeping up.

"Can you elaborate on that? Is that because of the binary storing in VCX

files? Would that also apply to SCX files too?

My business and data logic are all in PRGs so I'm just curious at this

point (because it seems like I'm protected otherwise since you only listed

VCX)."

Combining the dbf-like container in your dll or exe is easily consumable

unless the file itself, dll or exe, is secured.

Or it is just as safe as a prg in the same dll-exe.

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:36 PM, <mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com

> wrote:

> On 2016-12-02 14:30, Stephen Russell wrote:

>

>> vcx is a different name for a dbf file which is not secure at all.

>>

>

>

> Steve,

>

> That's true, but you apparently missed the front part of this thread

> perhaps. We're talking about securing via 1 of the 2 3rd party tools I

> mentioned earlier in the thread. Try to keep up. <g>

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMY+uuvbhFUPAoxf8yBBbGWdt7RVpd-OZt8mwaCeQ04J6ug@mail.gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2016 Stephen Russell