No, sorry

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Michael Madigan <mmadi10699@yahoo.com>wrote:

> Do you know why?

>

>

> ________________________________

> From: Sytze de Boer <sytze.kiss@gmail.com>

> To: profox@leafe.com

> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 1:23 AM

> Subject: Re: 2 versions sharing same databases, one says it's corrupt, the

> other fine

>

> Oooooooooh yes

>

> My table "fixer" system is based on VFP6 because it can open tables which

> VFP9 can't.

>

> S

>

>

>

> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Michael Madigan <mmadi10699@yahoo.com

> >wrote:

>

> > I have a system with two versions of the same software running, which are

> > almost identical.

> >

> > I have a Foxpro 2.6 program and a VFP 9.0 program.

> >

> > The VFP reports a corrupt tag, the 2.6 doesn't. Has anyone seen this

> > before?

> >

> > It's no big deal since I just recreate the index, but it is curious. Is

> > there better error checking in VFP 9.0?

> >

> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---

> > multipart/alternative

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAG1nNy_pMYEPGm9CUChBfr=wiLj0ospEAhUPD0brP7Vf36vsMg@mail.gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.