Re: [NF] http://duckduckgo.com replacement for google.com

Author: Ted Roche

Posted: 2011-08-25 at 15:31:45

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Jerry Foote <jerryf@footegroup.com> wrote:

> I Would pay a subscription for a objective search engine (not too much, say

> 12.00 a year)

Objective by whose standards? And who watches the watchmen?

Advertisers make their money figuring out how to game the system.

There's an entire industry of SEO ("Search Engine Optimization")

specialists whose sole purpose is to work out the optimal way to

increase search visibility. There are legitimate methods (better

structured pages and good use of keywords) and not so much (setting up

farms of fake blogs - splogs - whose links back into a target site

give it false credibility and page rank.)

--

Ted Roche

Ted Roche & Associates, LLC

http://www.tedroche.com

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4sLJbYy+4aFi9C+UxAvmiA2etV+a53NM2ymwydWDsb5Ww@mail.gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2011 Ted Roche