Re: [rant] Requirements gathering gone incomplete.

Author: Stephen Russell

Posted: 2011-02-15 at 19:36:00

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Rick Schummer

<profox@whitelightcomputing.com> wrote:

>>> The fact that you got so far along before anyone noticed that important

> feature X was missing was what I was reacting to.<<

>

> You are making one huge assumption, no matter what methodology used, many

> users tend to not test until the very last minute. Often they don't realize

> it until they cannot do something in production after the release. I have

> seen this problem in tight iterations under agile approaches, and long

> iterations like the waterfall methodology. Even with test plans. Sure they

> say they test, but in reality they are busy using the old software doing the

> day job, and find testing too time consuming.

>

> Sure, all bad reasons and most of it inexcusable, but I have seen this

> repeated enough over the years to know I don't assume the end users ever

> test completely.

------------------------------

why this subject starts with [rant]

;->

--

Stephen Russell

Sr. Production Systems Programmer

CIMSgts

901.246-0159 cell

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/AANLkTi=MuFWem_6N1QCKMpqdT3AWMcr23BY2eR7yRO+Y@mail.gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2011 Stephen Russell