On of the comments to that article hit it on the head. Consensus has

nothing to do with AGW's scientific validity: it's about

reproducibility. Missing data invalidates the conclusion, period,

unless some other studies can reproduce the same results.

- Publius

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Michael Madigan <mmadi10699@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Arrest these people.

>

> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/56f880751002150019o1e352900yfe5af36b5c2bfe37@mail.gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.