Author: MB Software Solutions, LLC
Posted: 2011-04-29 at 15:18:35
On 4/29/2011 3:14 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
> On 4/29/11 12:07 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
>> On 4/29/2011 3:04 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
>>> Subversion was the source control system to use ten years ago. It is still as good as
>>> it ever was, but there are better choices these days. Starting fresh today, I'd pick
>>> Mercurial or Git.
>>
>>
>> Why do you like these over Subversion?
>
> Never used 'em, but I trust the people I listen to. I still use Subversion because it
> works well enough for me, but Mercurial and Git are distributed version control
> systems, which means they make it much more convenient to collaborate with others.
>
> We still use Subversion for Dabo, but at some point when it makes sense to do so I'll
> move it forward to Git or Mercurial.
And do those work with Windows systems? I know you're a non-Windows guy
some (or most) of the time for your work.
--
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4DBB0F0B.1060301@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.