RE: VFP a .NET language

Author: Tom Slayton

Posted: 2011-04-09 at 16:59:27

True, I still do new apps on VFP. I tell people that MS open sourced the

product. People are open to open source these days b/c of the cost savings

Fox has always had that advantage. It's especially cool when you package it

with MySQL.

-Tom.

-----Original Message-----

From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

Of Rick Schummer

Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 1:47 PM

To: profox@leafe.com

Subject: RE: VFP a .NET language

>> Wasn't it the announcement that there would be no VFP10, but open source

was mentioned and misunderstood by some as

meaning the core product, when they meant the Sedna stuff.<<

Not only the Sedna stuff as you mentioned (which was added to the VFPX Open

Source project: http://vfpx.codeplex.com),

but all the XSource (includes Builders, Wizards, and all the XBase tools

like Code References, Class Browser, Task Pane

Manager, etc.), the Fox Foundation Classes (FFC), the VFP localizations, and

the VFP 9 SP2 Help file have been added to

VFPX as well.

When you think about it, almost everything but the core VFP9.EXE file is

open sourced.

Rick

White Light Computing, Inc.

www.whitelightcomputing.com

www.swfox.net

www.rickschummer.com

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2DB924DEBDD04AB9A875243E453314F5@tms

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2011 Tom Slayton