Thanks, Gianni

Let me repeat mention of 2 possibilities for consideration

1. Open source VFP. In light of MS's new found interest and movement

in this direction it would be consistent to add FoxPro to the list.

Very importantly it would demonstrate support for the people who

bought into their acquisition of Fox, despite MS's secret plan to buy

it and kill it, with hugely damaging effect on businesses that trusted

MS would not do this.

This prospect can come to a head if a change to Windows breaks

something in FoxPro and the only way forward for FoxPro apps is a

service pack.

2. Identifying companies with competitive compilers as to their plans

and progress towards provide a bridge for FoxPro applications with a

minimum of re-writing.

Wes's matter of fact discussion on re-writing FoxPro applications

doesn't acknowledge that for small companies with substantial

applications built over many years the cost is prohibitive.

Bill

Quoting Gianni Turri <giannit62@gmail.com>:

> Hi Bill,

>

> was quoted and unclickable ...

>

> http://erw1.myfreesites.net/

>

> Gianni

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/20151219205425.Horde.3OcsArg8Gjpz_2-l2aR5bQ1@www.h2officesolutions.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.