Author: Dennis Lee Bieber
Posted: 2012-02-09 at 13:24:59
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:11:35 -0800, John Fabiani
<johnf@jfcomputer.com> wrote:
>On Thursday, February 09, 2012 11:26:50 AM Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>> My apologies, I don't have any experience directly with Dabo (like
>> Django, it's too much of a moving target for someone to dabble with in
>> their spare time -- and unlike Django, it hasn't even the benefit of
>> rapidly out-dated paper books!)...
>
>I totally disagree - Dabo is NOT a moving target. I have code that is now
>near 3 years old and it still runs without changes using todays commit. I
>will concede that a few changes may have broken someone's older code but that
>does not happen often. Ed, Paul and others try their best to insure that does
>not happen. That said, Dabo reserves the right to do so - if it makes sense
>to do so.
Okay, it's stabilized since I last tried to start something with
it...
>Yes it true Dabo lacks documentation. No Dabo does not have an "out-dated"
>book either. But if you review the recent changes to the doc's I think you
>will find they have improved. But that's not really what most developers
This is the killer for me -- especially at present when I'm paying
$50 for 1GB/30-day (whichever comes first) data access via my laptop's
AT&T card. I don't have the funds/time for browsing on-line
documentation to learn a framework. I hope to have DSL hooked up by the
end of the month (at which point I'll run both the Dabo and Django SVN
updates on my (slow) desktop machine.
--
Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN
wlfraed@ix.netcom.com HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: Dabo-users@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/5h38j79o124gptu00fuji18kjmqpec2eoq@4ax.com