Author: John Fabiani
Posted: 2012-03-06 at 14:40:47
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 01:48:26 PM Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
> > The examples you cite do not, in and of themselves, suggest making a
> > subclass in Dabo, although they sure did in VFP.
>
> While it's certainly easier to do in Dabo, I tend to be lazy. If I have to
> add dozens of controls with the same changes across many forms, I'd rather
> define the subclass once and then use that in all my forms.
> > hs.append(dabo.ui.dTextBox(self, DataField="name", **dataCtrlProps))
>
> I prefer the properties parameter rather than the ** form:
>
> hs.append(dabo.ui.dTextBox(self, DataField="name",
> properties=dataCtrlProps))
>
> They both work the same, but that's what that parameter was created for.
>
>
>
> -- Ed Leafe
STyler,
Just reading the answers should tell you a lot.
Ed's way still uses the base class but changes the properties. Sounds like he
was concerned with maintaining a consistent UI.
Sound's like Paul's situation is different where he needed a special action to
occur - so he built a special sub-class of two (maybe more) base class
controls - but still uses Dabo base classes.
In my case I too required a special action associated with a Dabo base class.
Just proves that Dabo's base classes are flexible and usable for most cases.
Johnf
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: Dabo-users@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/5973533.DkCP9fEona@linux-12