Author: John Fabiani
Posted: 2012-02-09 at 12:11:35
On Thursday, February 09, 2012 11:26:50 AM Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> My apologies, I don't have any experience directly with Dabo (like
> Django, it's too much of a moving target for someone to dabble with in
> their spare time -- and unlike Django, it hasn't even the benefit of
> rapidly out-dated paper books!)...
I totally disagree - Dabo is NOT a moving target. I have code that is now
near 3 years old and it still runs without changes using todays commit. I
will concede that a few changes may have broken someone's older code but that
does not happen often. Ed, Paul and others try their best to insure that does
not happen. That said, Dabo reserves the right to do so - if it makes sense
to do so.
I'm guessing that you have been watching the commits and are under the
impression that those commits break legacy code. 98% of the commits either
improve performance or add a new enhancement. If the 2% of the commits do
break legacy code that commit is fixed.
Yes it true Dabo lacks documentation. No Dabo does not have an "out-dated"
book either. But if you review the recent changes to the doc's I think you
will find they have improved. But that's not really what most developers
really want - is it. They want extended tutorials, how to's and a better
understanding the basic's of the framework. Just like Django I doubt we will
ever get there. But I'm sure the Dabo community will offer more in the
future.
Johnf
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: Dabo-users@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-users
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-users
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/2725112.Gt0cyhlKJW@linux-12