richmondeagle (AT) comcast .D.OT net wrote:
>> http://rc3.org/2007/11/anthropological.php
>
> The blogger is making an assumption that each event is singular and discreet...
ignoring the observation of behavior patterns for which there can be no
charitable explanation.
Then we also have to consider the academic tone of the article which
precludes an understanding
of the passions involved when something one cares about greatly (like
one's country) is attacked
repeatedly froma source one would expect to be supportive (like fellow
citizens).
Considering civility has already gone out the window........
Larry, why don't you say "I" instead of "one" when you mean "I"? Why
don't you call a spade "a spade"? If you are going to treat this as a
personal thing just make it plain.
>
> If some things don't get your blood boiling, you are either numb or dead.
You mean : "Some things get my blood boiling. And it's not my
responsibility, I'm not responsible for what I feel or do.".
>
> Life is little like the discussion groups up in them thar ivory towers.
Meaning "I have never been able to live MY life the way these people
preach".
> We live in the real world where we watched fellwo Americans diving out of the WTC rather
than burn to death. We do not have the luxury of analyzing everything
with academic disinterest...
and more to the point, if someone is hurting me, my family or my
country, do I really care what
their motivations are?
And again you use "we" when you really mean "I". And I guess you mean
something like "I'm all for law and order, but as soon as someone
touches MY interests then to hell with all that, law and order apply to
other people not to me."
>
> Having said that I must say that I know some Ds that are decent people... just a little naive.
And you finally leave throwing darts against those "fellow citizens"
from which you expected "support". No wonder! I wouldn't give an aspirin
to someone who talks about me the way you do.
Cheers
©2007 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ricardo_Ar=E1oz?= |
