Not when the undecided vote is the plurality.
There is no way to prove global warming.
1. We don't know what the highest average temperature
was 10,000, 100,000, or 1,000,000 years ago
2. If we did know, we wouldn't know whether man had
anything to do with the increase.
Did cavemen cause the end of the iceage with the
discovery of fire?
--- Derek Kalweit <dkalweit AT gmail D.O.T com> wrote:
> > OK plurality.
>
> Secondly, most ways of decision making discount the
> 'undecided' or
> 'not voting' numbers, making endorsement the clear
> majority-- the
> exception being 'absolute majority'.
>
>
> --
> Derek
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
>
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5150ce9c0708301221w6725e6f5yf36df50194836ee0 AT mail D.O.T gmail.com
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are the opinions of the author, and do not
> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
> too stupid to see the obvious.
>
©2007 Michael Madigan |
