Right, how do you win a "war on terror" when "terror", "terrorism" and
"terrorist" have not be clearly defined. How do you determine who are
terrorist and who are not. What uniform does the enemy wear, that we
can declare war against them, and who is the general or commander with
which we can negotiate a peace after the terror surrenders?
Terror has always been with us in one form or another, and it always
will be with us. Terror should not be a military matter, but rather a
police matter. Preemptive war is the wrong tool to use against
terrorism; rather, the police should be used to investigate, discover,
and identify terrorist to preempt terror plots before they can do us harm.
Regards,
LelandJ
David Crooks wrote:
> On Monday, April 30, 2007 5:55 PM Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
>
> <snipped>
>
>
>> If the policing of terror, terrorist, and terrorism is war; what will
>>
> be next; "The war on illegal Drugs", The
>
>> War on Poverty", The War on Unwed Mother and others who do not abstain
>>
> form sex before marriage, The war on
>
>> illegal Aliens, etc, and is using our military the right tool for these
>>
> kind of social problems?
>
> I thought we already had these other wars and no one won??
>
> David L. Crooks
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
©2007 Leland F. Jackson, CPA |
