> -----Original Message-----
> From: profoxtech-bounces /AT/ leafe D.OT com [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com]
> On Behalf Of Stephen the Cook
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 4:00 PM
> To: profoxtech /AT/ leafe D.OT com
> Subject: RE: Lack of Written Specifications
>
> Ed Leafe <> wrote:
> > On Feb 28, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> >
> >> Often times work is performed where there is no documentation or
> >> written specifications and authorizations to do the work are verbal.
> >
> > Written docs *are* verbal. I believe you mean 'oral'.
> >
> > Just checking in from the nitpicking squad... ;-)
>
> Asshole.
>
> ;->
>
> Stephen Russell
> DBA / .Net Developer
>
> Memphis TN 38115
> 901.246-0159
>
> "A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
> can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown
>
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/
>
I actually took Ed's advice (and others' too). I originally used "verbal"
because I didn't want to get you guys riled up! ;^) For those that are
interested here is the language I went with:
"""Absence of Written Specifications
Often times work is performed where there is no documentation or written
specifications and authorizations to do the work are oral. In the event
there is no written specification both parties will agree on a release
version of the application as a benchmark of features and functionality.
The source code of the agreed upon version will be considered the basis for
future work on the project. All reports, forms and processes included in
the application's source code will be included in the scope of this
Agreement and be considered "agreed upon" by both parties."""
Jeff
Jeff Johnson
jeff@san-dc.com
623-582-0323
Fax 623-869-0675
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/signed
text/plain (text body -- kept)
application/x-pkcs7-signature
---
©2007 Jeff Johnson |
