On 4/30/06 4:58 PM, "Joakim Schramm" <joakim AT astrocalc .DOT com> wrote:
>> For strings that can vary, and which can be with length >
>> lets say 10 bytes, VarChars can be more effective of strings.
>>
>> String[20] - okay still can be
>>
>> String[60] ? Hmm. In 90% NO
>>
>> String[100] -- most probably no. VarChar better
>>
> I have only changed the maxsize of VarChar to smaller values, but most of
> them will go as I remove the keys. I have some of these now as 4 char
> strings.
Deal is that maxsize of VarChar DO NOT make smaller db.
IT is just logical limit which work on INSERT
> I know try to find out how I can iterate a BitSet returned from FindValue -
> but I guess it's somewere in the manual, so am looking for it.
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
_______________________________________________
Valentina mailing list
Valentina@lists.macserve.net
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
©2006 Ruslan Zasukhin |
