> -----Original Message-----
> From: valentina-bounces At lists .DOT macserve.net
> [mailto:valentina-bounces@lists.macserve.net] On Behalf Of
> Ruslan Zasukhin
> Sent: 30 April 2006 15:54
> To: valentina At lists .DOT macserve.net
> Subject: Re: Table structure?
>
> On 4/30/06 4:02 PM, "Joakim Schramm" <joakim@astrocalc.com> wrote:
>
> >> In below code I see only VarChars with 1022 length
> >>
> > This code is now somewhat old as I have done changes so no more
> > VarChar 1022
>
> You mean that you have convert all VarChar to Strings ???
No.
> This is also not good idea!
>
I know, I read manual :-)
> For strings that can vary, and which can be with length >
> lets say 10 bytes, VarChars can be more effective of strings.
>
> String[20] - okay still can be
>
> String[60] ? Hmm. In 90% NO
>
> String[100] -- most probably no. VarChar better
>
I have only changed the maxsize of VarChar to smaller values, but most of
them will go as I remove the keys. I have some of these now as 4 char
strings.
I know try to find out how I can iterate a BitSet returned from FindValue -
but I guess it's somewere in the manual, so am looking for it.
Joakim
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Ruslan Zasukhin
> VP Engineering and New Technology
> Paradigma Software, Inc
>
> Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information http://www.paradigmasoft.com
>
> [I feel the need: the need for speed]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Valentina mailing list
> Valentina At lists .DOT macserve.net
> http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
>
_______________________________________________
Valentina mailing list
Valentina@lists.macserve.net
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
©2006 Joakim Schramm |
