On Nov 30, 2005, at 4:21 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> Lets assume that you are correct and that we do know where these
> wmd's are
> at and that they are in syria.
>
> Are you suggesting that we go into syria and get them just like we
> thought
> we were doing in Iraq ?
>
> What would happen if we were wrong ?
>
> Yet from what I'm hearing, you are suggesting exactly that .
Not quite. I am suggesting that anyone who bought the argument
that the presence of WMD in Iraq justified an immediate invasion
would also have to support the immediate invasion of Syria if they
were "proven" to be there. By "proven", I mean that the same level of
evidence that was used in the Iraq situation.
I didn't believe that the evidence was sufficient in 2002, so
it's not me we're talking about here. We're talking about everyone
who backed the invasion of Iraq, from the NY Times to NY Post.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
©2005 Ed Leafe |
