Lets assume that you are correct and that we do know where these wmd's are
at and that they are in syria.
Are you suggesting that we go into syria and get them just like we thought
we were doing in Iraq ?
What would happen if we were wrong ?
Yet from what I'm hearing, you are suggesting exactly that .
As for military intelligence, I did my time and I find that for the majority
they are quite capable.
You seem to forget that military intelligence is similar to the ceo's of
IBM, ORACLE and Microsoft trying to formulate their plans based on what they
THINK the other is doing, because they do not know what the other is doing.
In any event, it is a best guess scenario, whether it be military or
commercial and anybody that posture's otherwise has been at the bar way too
long today.
Virgil Bierschwale
http://www.HarperValleyStore.com
http://www.itspasttime.org
-----Original Message-----
From: profox-bounces /at/ leafe .DOT com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf
Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 3:12 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] In What God Do We Trust?
On Nov 30, 2005, at 11:32 AM, Wolfe Stephen S GS-11 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote:
> What is the final risk analysis here? The UN images were
> declassified, maybe, we have images that are classified and need to
> stay classified until certain actions are taken or events unfold.
Brilliant. Declassify that which doesn't show anything
conclusively, but 3 years and thousands of lives later, we're still
holding on to those classified photos that would have enabled us to
get the WMD we went into Iraq for in the first place.
I guess that's why "military intelligence" is the most often
cited case of an oxymoron.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
[excessive quoting removed by server]
©2005 Virgil Bierschwale |
