main logo
Subject: Re: [OT] Scalito!
Author: Leland Jackson
Posted: 2005/10/31 21:37:12
 
View Entire Thread
New Search


This is interesting. What's up with so many Supreme Court Justices
being Catholic? Another thing that seem to appeal to the Bush
Administration regarding Supreme Court Justices is a belief by the
nominee that the legislature make the laws, not judges. Also, both
Chief Justice Roberts and Judge Alito worked as Attorneys for the
Republican Administrations of President Regan and President George H W
Bush. It seem like so much of the Regan and George H W Bush
Administrations has found their way into the current Bush
Administration, including all the neocons.

#-------------------------------------------------

The Left was quick to demonise Judge Alito as an extreme conservative
who would outlaw abortion, strike down affirmative action and generally
return American life to the political Stone Age. Democrats focused
yesterday on a case in which the judge dissented from the majority of
his appeals court when it struck down a Pennsylvania law in 1991 that
required a woman seeking an abortion to notify her husband. He insisted
in his dissent that he was not voicing his own views but observing the
constitutional principle that legislatures make the laws, not judges.

It was also noted, sotto voce, that Judge Alito would bring the total
number of Catholics on the court to five, a majority on the nine-member
panel.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,11069-1851678,00.html

or

http://tinyurl.com/abdwf
#-------------------------------------------------

Regards,

LelandJ



Profox wrote:

>> You really have to let go of that Religious Righter thing. You and
>> Bill with his Neo Con cabal have been sipping the conspiratorial Kool
>> Aid too eagerly lately.
>>
>> Lay off the punch, come up for air, and join the rational discussion
>> of the issues again!
>
>
> Part Two:
>
> I guess you'll have to add me to the conspiratorial koolaid sippers,
> although technically when everything's out in the open I don't know
> how it can be a conspiracy.
>
> Why just in the last few weeks haven't we heard public statements
> to the Religous Right from Bush himself on how Miers was "one of us"
> and how she's an "Evangelical"? That went well beyond the traditional
> "code words" and "winks and nods" they usually use to communicate.
>
> The Religous Right leaders where just as out front with statements
> that they feared she wouldn't vote as they wanted.
>
> Back in my legal days we called what's going on "judge shopping".
>
> As for the NeoCons, they've been just as out front, hell they've
> published tons of white papers and think tank articles on their
> road map. Funny how the road we've taken follows that map to
> the letter.
>
> I don't think it was a conspiracy though, heck Bush asked Cheney
> to find him a VP candidate to run with and lo and behold, Dick
> couldn't find anyone but himself.
>
> Then once elected Dick couldn't help but bring his other NeoCon
> brethren on board. No need to name them, we all know who they
> are, no secrets there.
>
> To me the real conspiracy is how conservatives have allowed
> themselves to be duped by the Republicans who are hell bent
> on turning the United States into another Mexico where there
> are a few filthy rich running the show and everyone else is just
> a peasant.
>
> Why I'm concerned about that is a mystery to me because I'll
> be one of the filthy rich. I guess it's my socialistic upbringing
> down in rural South Alabama.
>
> Jim Eddins
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]


 
©2005 Leland Jackson
<-- Prior Message New Search Next Message -->