Well, I'll type real slow. It's kind of like someone insisting on
smoking a foul smelling cigar in a small public place. What they do in
their own places is their business... and if it is publicized
sufficiently and I don't have to deal with it... MAYBE an art museum is
workable.
But the conventions of our society tell us that polite company is kept
with our clothes on... most people just don't look good enough to get
away with it. And, we have enough people imposing themselves on people
around them. If their purpose is just to destroy conventions... who
cares what they want anyway?
Larry Miller
-----Original Message-----
From: Vince Teachout [mailto:teachv .at. taconic D.O.T net]
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 11:23 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] : Art in the buff
At 06:21 PM 7/30/2005 -0400, Larry Miller wrote:
>
>Amazing... what makes those people think we want to see them
>unclothed... especially after dinner. Gag me with a dead smurf!
Ok, I'll bite: What made you think those people care if you see them
unclothed or not? My guess is that the majority of people who attended
were either nudists, or wannabee nudists, delighted with a chance for a
new
venue. Followed by people who wanted to see "nekked people", and a few
unfortunates who had no clue, and were probably evenly divided among a)
horrified, b) tickled, and c) don't care.
>They want to make a moral deal out of everything, when they just don't
>realize they are not worth looking at... repulsive in many cases even.
What makes them "not worth looking at?" Or, "worth looking at", for
that
matter?
How did you infer "make a moral deal" out of this promotion? And why
are,
say, sagging buttocks or wrinkly breasts any more repulsive than sagging
jowls or wrinkled faces?
To me, it sounded kind of fun, kind of bizarre. I think I might have
gone,
had I lived there, but probably would have worn swimming
trunks. (considering myself to be somewhat repulsive. :-) )
"The birthday suit - timeless fashion, created by GOD"
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.7/60 - Release Date: 7/28/2005
©2005 Larry Miller |
