Vince Teachout <> wrote this on Saturday, July 30, 2005 10:23 PM:
> At 06:21 PM 7/30/2005 -0400, Larry Miller wrote:
> >
> >Amazing... what makes those people think we want to see them
> >unclothed... especially after dinner. Gag me with a dead smurf!
>
> Ok, I'll bite: What made you think those people care if you see them
> unclothed or not? My guess is that the majority of people who
> attended were either nudists, or wannabee nudists, delighted with a
> chance for a new venue. Followed by people who wanted to see "nekked
> people", and a few unfortunates who had no clue, and were probably
> evenly divided among a) horrified, b) tickled, and c) don't care.
>
> >They want to make a moral deal out of everything, when they just
> don't >realize they are not worth looking at... repulsive in many
> cases even.
>
> What makes them "not worth looking at?" Or, "worth looking at", for
> that matter?
>
> How did you infer "make a moral deal" out of this promotion? And why
> are, say, sagging buttocks or wrinkly breasts any more repulsive than
> sagging jowls or wrinkled faces?
>
> To me, it sounded kind of fun, kind of bizarre. I think I might have
> gone, had I lived there, but probably would have worn swimming
> trunks. (considering myself to be somewhat repulsive. :-) )
>
> "The birthday suit - timeless fashion, created by GOD"
When it comes to art it's all in the eye of the beholder.
Stephen Russell
S.R. & Associates
Memphis, TN 38115
901.246-0159
http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/
©2005 Stephen the Cook |
