At 06:21 PM 7/30/2005 -0400, Larry Miller wrote:
>
>Amazing... what makes those people think we want to see them
>unclothed... especially after dinner. Gag me with a dead smurf!
Ok, I'll bite: What made you think those people care if you see them
unclothed or not? My guess is that the majority of people who attended
were either nudists, or wannabee nudists, delighted with a chance for a new
venue. Followed by people who wanted to see "nekked people", and a few
unfortunates who had no clue, and were probably evenly divided among a)
horrified, b) tickled, and c) don't care.
>They want to make a moral deal out of everything, when they just don't
>realize they are not worth looking at... repulsive in many cases even.
What makes them "not worth looking at?" Or, "worth looking at", for that
matter?
How did you infer "make a moral deal" out of this promotion? And why are,
say, sagging buttocks or wrinkly breasts any more repulsive than sagging
jowls or wrinkled faces?
To me, it sounded kind of fun, kind of bizarre. I think I might have gone,
had I lived there, but probably would have worn swimming
trunks. (considering myself to be somewhat repulsive. :-) )
"The birthday suit - timeless fashion, created by GOD"
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.7/60 - Release Date: 7/28/2005
©2005 Vince Teachout |
