----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen the Cook" <stephen.russell At adribbers D.O.T com>
To: <profoxtech@leafe.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 5:44 PM
Subject: RE: Close Database Major change VFP 9
> Sounds fishy. Are you using a default company when the forms opens in the
> DE? If so maybe no using the DE to begin with? I never used/trusted the
DE
> myself.
Yes. I am using default company when the forms openusing DE. Even using DE
or not DE, the new change will not allow to close database.
> Why not, it's their product. Bad Steve! Actually that should have come
up
> in the beta testing that people did. Funny how this is the first I've
heard
> of this.
Development and learing is always incremental. When there is new version, we
have to just look at what are changes. Even a small change, in the MS view
point, may affect the develpoment in general. What is important is that
reporting every changes that have been made in new version is important. It
is true that it is their product. They can do they want. They may have
compeling reason to make changes. But what they are supposed to do is that
all changes should be reported.
> > Is there is any workaround to close database in a form ?
>
> Add a column for company in the transaction tables. Sucksthat you have to
> vist all the lookups and add the company # to the where clause though.
It is like using only one database for all companies. Though workable, may
not be feasible in a longer run.
> Stephen Russell
> S.R. & Associates
> Memphis, TN 38115
>
> 901.246-0159
>
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
©2005 D C Jariwala |
