Because it actually works and that is of secondary importance.
Larry Miller
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Madigan [mailto:mmadi10699 AT yahoo .DO.T com]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 9:36 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] Shuttle Foam Loss Linked to EPA Regs
Instead of foam, why aren't we using asbestos?
--- Larry Miller <richmondeagle@comcast.net> wrote:
> It's time we come up with a new vehicle design, but
> to not use the best
> products for politically correct reasons is pure
> foolishness.
>
> Larry Miller
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean Laeremans
> [mailto:laeremans.jeanmarie AT gmail .DO.T com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 10:47 AM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Shuttle Foam Loss Linked to EPA
> Regs
>
> On 7/28/05, Michael Madigan <mmadi10699@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Save the environment, kill some astronauts.
>
> That thing is a lame duck..with or without freon
> based foam....
> A+
> jml
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: ProFox AT leafe .DO.T com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are the opinions of the author, and do not
> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
> too stupid to see the obvious.
>
©2005 Larry Miller |
