Michael Oke, II wrote:
> Pete Theisen wrote:
>>
>> You are SO wrong. The government has a clear secular interest in
>> people keeping their promises of all kinds, particularly written
>> contracts or public pledges. In the case of marriage, the integrity of
>> families, the security of the children as well as the security of the
>> spouses and the stability of the community are all involved.
>>
<snip>
> I'm going to guess that you actually believe that the government belongs
> in our bedrooms and for that I feel sad for you. Please demonstrate for
> me how the government having jurisdiction over this would lead any of
> what you wrote? The government was not established to control our
> personal lives and make no mistake, choosing to have sex outside of your
> marriage is a personal choice.
Hi Michael!
I'm going to tell your wife you said that and see what she thinks about
it. <s> I remember a time, and it was a good time, when none of this was
even questioned, and we had none of the aids, divorces, flamboyant
queers running around, etc., etc.
It could only be a "personal" choice if you had married yourself, if you
were your own husband and/or your own wife. The only close approximation
of that is a masturbator.
OK, if you are single you can give yourself a hand job with my blessing,
but if you are married, your wife is the one who has to give you
permission to give yourself a hand job. She might want you to use your
sexual energy on her, not on your fist. She would almost certainly
strenuously object to you porking some aids bag and then coming after
her fresh from that, unless she's nuts.
Regards,
Pete
©2005 Pete Theisen |
