"Pooh-pooh" was you word. If I thought there was anything new in what
you had to say I might have responded. From your writings it was clear
you did not believe a victory for the Bush policy was possible or
desirable as it would serve to keep those people in office since they
were proven right.
Would it kill you to admit that something good went on over in Iraq or
are you so conditioned by the negative press to interpret things in the
worst possible terms?
As far as some of the points you bring up... I heard it all 35-40 years
ago, we tried it and it didn't work. Now let the people with vision do
their jobs without the constant carping. Whatever happened to the
concept of 'loyal opposition'?
The respectable thing, if you really believe the system can work, is to
do what you can to get someone like Hillary elected in 2008. I won't
agree with you, but I'll respect your position.
Larry Miller
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Arnold [mailto:bill at wjarnold DOT com]
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 11:43 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] the Iraq election
> All I can say is "pooh-pooh".
Well, that's informative!
> Just because you didn't get the blood bath you were hoping for you now
have to discount
> what went on.
So, you can't think of a single thing to respond to what I actually did
say, so you'll invent something that I didn't say, or even think? How
about you point me to a single word I've ever said that even remotely
resembles wanting people killed, or a 'blood bath' as you call it?
In fact, the only action that I've called for at all is the jailing of
the people who made that invasion happen, after a fair trial of course.
>And you think we conservatives are cynical!
Another word that didn't come from me. Try something more accurate, like
misguided.
Bill
>
> Larry Miller
©2005 Larry Miller |
