> but after that initial failure, I chose SPT and have never looked back.
> IMO, it's far superior.
>
In some previous Oracle and MS SQL Server projects (in 1998 or so) I used
SPT as well with VFP, and was always pleased with the results. As tempting
as it is to use CursorAdapter with the migration of a few of my commercial
apps from a VFP back end to MySQL (for scalability, internal security &
ability to run over a thin-net backbone), I have remembered enough about
Ed's experience to help me accept the need rewrite with SPT.
Gil
Gilbert M. Hale
New Freedom Data Resources
Pittsford, NY
585-359-8085
gil /at/ gilhale .DOT com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com
> [mailto:profoxtech-bounces /at/ leafe .DOT com]On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 5:24 PM
> To: profoxtech@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: mysql vs ms sql server
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2005, at 5:09 PM, Gilbert M. Hale wrote:
>
> > Perhaps Ed can weigh in on the use of CursorAdapter with VFP8 and MySQL
>
> There was a bug in the CA code that prevented updates from
> being sent
> correctly to MySQL. For all I know they may have since corrected it,
> but after that initial failure, I chose SPT and have never looked back.
> IMO, it's far superior.
>
> ___/
> /
> __/
> /
> ____/
> Ed Leafe
> http://leafe.com/
> http://dabodev.com/
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
©2005 Gilbert M. Hale |
