Excellent response John.
--- john.v.petersen (at) comcast .D.O.T net wrote:
> Ed,
> Your liberal rhetoric is priceless - but I suppose that is all
> that is left in the tank. For the record, I do not believe JK's
> service in Vietnam itself is at issue. Rather, what is at issue
> is what he did when he came back. Of course, I am referring to
> his 1971 congressional testimony. In that year, he in effect,
> sold out all of those who served in Vietnam. Today, he flips -
> yet again - to sell himself as a war hero. The same can be said
> of your website. To promote your personal/political agenda, you
> have a ticker showing the number of casualties. At the same
> time, you don't say one word about supporting the troops.
> Simply put, while you would be the first to wrap yourself in
> the flag of liberty, you not only would likely be the last one
> to step in an defend liberty, you would also be the last one to
> simply support the efforts of not only our troops - but of the
> entire coalition of the willing.
> The liberal wing of the democratic party - which seems to be
> the wing in control - represents the party of appeasement and
> moral relativism. Quickly, they have become the party of
> Neville Chamberlain. The fact is, hoping and praying the "bad
> people" will go away - will not work. It did not work for the
> English Prime Minister in 1940 and it will not work today in
> the war on terror.
> If you want to debate something, debate John Kerry's senate
> record. In the last 19 years in the senate, there is not a
> single piece of significant legislation with his name on it as
> sponsor. Further, after the first World Trade Center bombing,
> he voted to gut defense and intelligence. He also voted against
> the first Gulf War - in spite of the fact that the USA did go
> to the UN - in exactly the manner Kerry outlines as the proper
> way we should be prosecuting the war on terror. Today, Kerry
> did support the war in Iraq - but then voted against an 87B
> appropriation to fund the efforts of our troops.
> Your priceless...you say the President was a drunken coward and
> Kerry was a war hero. What about Bill Clinton? Or...does he get
> a free pass...
> In my opinion, Kerry's focus on his "3 Purple Hearts" and
> Vietnam is nothing more than a smoke screen to divert attention
> from his senate record. That record by the way, includes
> missing 70+% of the intelligence committee briefings - a
> committee he sat on - after the first WTC bombing.
> Always happy to debate the issues - I look forward to your
> reply.
> John
> Coordinator - Bush/Cheney 04
> Tredyffrin Township - West
>
>
> On Aug 31, 2004, at 7:32 AM, Cotton Mr Jerry P wrote:
>
> > And I'm still waiting on you to drop this stuff so we can get
> to the
> > issues.
>
> I put forth a proposal for dropping it: admit that Bush is a
> drunken
> coward, and Kerry is a war hero, stop your "wankin about taking
> a
> loss", as you put it, and move on. I'm waiting for you to
> accept that
> proposal, which is just as fair as the one you put forth, and
> move on.
>
> > And I'm still waiting on one reason to vote for Kerry.
>
> What, http://leafe.com/archives/showMsg/217785 isn't enough? I
> responded directly to your request, and you've not only ignored
> it, but
> now claim that I never responded!
>
> Why am I not surprised?
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> ---
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the
> opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical
> advice. This statement is added to the messages for those
> lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
>
>
=====
Flush the Johns!
John Kerry is simply amazing, 3 purple hearts and not a day spent in the hospital!
www.swiftvets.com
©2004 Michael Madigan |
