They were allowed to keep a military, just not WMD or long-range
missiles.
--- Gary Sutherland <gary /AT/ HarrowdenIT D.O.T co.uk> wrote:
> If Iraq had destroyed all of its defensive capability and, for
> example, Iran
> had invaded them would the US have depployed troops to defend
> it?
>
> You have to remember that we're dealing with real people with
> very real
> strengths and weaknesses.
>
> Cheers
> Gary
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com
> [mailto:profox-bounces /AT/ leafe D.O.T com]On
> Behalf Of Jeff Fisher
> Sent: 30 May 2004 00:53
> To: 'ProFox Email List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Uh oh - Direct link between Saddam and
> 9/11discoveredinSaddam's Docs?
>
>
> What amazes me is how the entire left has forgotten what Saddam
> declared as
> late as December 2002 that showed how he broke the last
> resolution.
> How many people here remember that on that late of date, Saddam
> claimed to
> still have VX nerve gas (3.9 tons worth), sarin gas (812 tons)
> and anthrax
> (2,200 gallons) which placed in his missiles that we found that
> were capable
> of going well beyond what the terms of the cease fire, could
> have wiped out
> all of Israel. Or if brought over to our country, could have
> easily wiped
> out all of New York along with a few other cities instead of
> 'just' losing
> 3,000 people.
>
>
> jeff fisher
> www.turbofish.com
>
>
> --- Gary Sutherland <gary@HarrowdenIT.co.uk> wrote:
> > In the same way the US was supposed to have disposed of its
> > stocks of
> > Smallpox yet chose not to do so?
> >
> > Sure, Iraq was supposed to have disposed of the earlier stuff
> > and if this is
> > anything to go by they did get rid of the vaste majority.
> Given
> > the size of
> > the arsenal at the time I'm not surprised a few bits and
> pieces
> > were
> > overlooked, either by accident or design.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Gary
> >
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
©2004 Michael Madigan |
