A case of 'Do as I say, not do as I do", eh?
If you expect to be taken seriously as a country you should lead by example.
Cheers
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: profox-bounces at leafe .DOT com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com]On
Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent: 29 May 2004 23:29
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] Uh oh - Direct link between Saddam and 9/11discovered
inSaddam's Docs?
Oh yeah, you're the guy who stays awake at night worrying about
an attack on England by the USA.
--- Gary Sutherland <gary at HarrowdenIT .DOT co.uk> wrote:
> In the same way the US was supposed to have disposed of its
> stocks of
> Smallpox yet chose not to do so?
>
> Sure, Iraq was supposed to have disposed of the earlier stuff
> and if this is
> anything to go by they did get rid of the vaste majority. Given
> the size of
> the arsenal at the time I'm not surprised a few bits and pieces
> were
> overlooked, either by accident or design.
>
> Cheers
> Gary
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com
> [mailto:profox-bounces at leafe .DOT com]On
> Behalf Of Pete Theisen
> Sent: 29 May 2004 06:33
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Uh oh - Direct link between Saddam and
> 9/11discovered
> in Saddam's Docs?
>
>
> Hi Dan!
>
> Yep, Saddie was *supposed to* get rid of those, was he not?
>
> At 01:28 PM 5/28/2004, you wrote:
> >At 09:32 05/27/04 -0700, Michael Madigan wrote:
> >>Most of the enemy media won't print this. How many people
> heard
> >>of the confirmation of sarin gas found in Iraq?
> >>
> >>So, if anyone bothers to look at this, the Democrats are
> finished
> >>because their whole campaign is based on the Iraq war being a
> >>mistake.
> >
> >The army has announced that the warhead with the sarin in it
> dated from
> >before the first Gulf War.
> >
> >
> >Dan Covill
>
> Regards,
>
> Pete
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
©2004 Gary Sutherland |
