Maybe, maybe not. So far as the Catholic church goes it's continued open
policy of precluding marriage must tend towards attracting or generating an
environment where abuse of this kind can flourish.
Cheers
Gry
-----Original Message-----
From: profox-bounces .at. leafe .D.OT com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com]On
Behalf Of Leland F. Jackson, CPA
Sent: 28 February 2004 16:56
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: Re [OT] Constitutional Amendment - Gay Marriage
Hi Pete,
A recent study undertaken by the Catholic Church indicates sexual abuse
of children as a percentage of a given group may be most prevalent
within the Catholic Church. I would not be surprised if the same
problem did not exist within the Christian Church, even within the
Religious Right persuasion of religion.
Anyway, there definitely is a problem with sexual abuse of children
amount Catholic Priests. The problem seem go as high as four percent
of Catholic Priests have abused children.
Regards,
LelandJ
Pete Theisen wrote:
> Hi Leland!
>
> Been there, done that. The "counsellors" are the biggest faggots of
> all, by the way. What color *should* my views be, brown? The kind of
> balance we need here is them in jail and normal people, and normal
> people's children, free of them.
>
> I am dealing with it just fine, *they* have to deal with me, now, and
> I don't think they quite like it. They most likely wish I would die or
> go away or get tired or something.
>
>
> At 09:28 AM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
>
>> Hi Pete,
>>
>> Your personal tragedy as a youngster seem to be coloring your views
>> on this issue, so you would probably have a hard time seeing the
>> issue in a more balanced way. You might talk to a counselor about
>> you childhood, to come to terms with what happened, deal with it, and
>> then let it good. You definitely have a fair amount of emotions,
>> anger, etc, that is probably being repressed.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> LelandJ
>>
>> Pete Theisen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Leland!
>>>
>>> Well, if I were a Texas legislator, I would certainly want to "site
>>> on important committees"! But I would be opposed to gay's getting
>>> "married" in any case. I think the whole thing misses the point. The
>>> time spent on this would be better spent preparing interment camps
>>> to segregate the most deviant of these people from the general public.
>>>
>>> At 11:00 AM 2/26/2004, you wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Pete,<snip> they can punish there opponents by not allow them to
>>>> site on important committees, <snip>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Pete
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
©2004 Gary Sutherland |
