Pete,
The original thread, if I remember correctly was about how to control
the way Eudora works when you did a reply to all. Those 2 options are
specific to that behavior. I wasn't thinking about the quoting string.
Vince has since found an INI hack that let's him accomplish what he was
after.
Pete Theisen wrote:
> Hi Richard!
>
> Really? Mine is weirder than that, mine has about six . . . Eudora 6.
>
> At 09:58 AM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
>
>> In Options, click on the Replying button. There are 2 settings in
>> there that control how Eudora handles this that you can play with.
>>
>> Vince Teachout wrote:
>>
>>> At 02:36 AM 2/27/04 -0500, Pete Theisen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Vince!
>>>>
>>>> I also use Eudora. What is the advantage of reply to all? A simple
>>>> reply to the list does the same people, does it not?
>>>>
>>>> At 01:18 PM 2/26/2004, you wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> At 01:04 PM 2/26/04 -0500, Michael J. Babcock wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is anyone else getting doubles of his emails, or am I just
>>>>>> special? ;-)<snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Pete
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not quite. Look at the top of the part you quoted, an compare it to
>>> the first line in this message:
>>> "At <date, time>, you wrote", vs, "At <date, time> <Sender Name>
>>> wrote:"
>>>
>>> "you wrote" is what Eudora puts if it's reply, <Sender Name> wrote
>>> is what it puts for reply all.
>>>
>>> Usually "you wrote" is fine, but sometimes I want the sender's name
>>> in there, especially if there are a lot of replies going back and
>>> forth.
>>> Kmail let's you set the text for the reply string, which would solve
>>> the problem, but I haven't found anywhere to set it in Eudora.
>>>
>>> Now, let's see if I remember to take off the extra TO: name in
>>> this......
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
©2004 Richard Kaye |
