main logo
Subject: RE: [OT] Hooray for Clear Channel
Author: Pete Theisen
Posted: 2004/02/28 04:23:00
 
View Entire Thread
New Search


Hi Adam!

Tending in that direction, though, sigh!

At 10:29 AM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
>Actually I was quoting out of turn, it hasn't been removed, it's only a
>proposal...
>
>
>DOH!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pete Theisen [mailto:petet .at. acun DO.T com]
>Sent: 27 February 2004 10:31
>To: ProFox Email List
>Subject: RE: [OT] Hooray for Clear Channel
>
>Hi Adam!
>
>We did? Who's we?
>
>At 03:44 AM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
> >Well that's why we took adultery out of the list of divorce reasons.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Pete Theisen [mailto:petet@acun.com]
> >Sent: 27 February 2004 06:17
> >To: ProFox Email List
> >Subject: Re: [OT] Hooray for Clear Channel
> >
> >Hi Ed!
> >
> >"He who looks with lust at a woman hath already committed adultery with
> >her
> >in his heart".
> >
> >At 10:12 AM 2/26/2004, you wrote:
> > >On Feb 26, 2004, at 9:28 AM, Crooks, David L. wrote:
> > >
> > >>I never liked Stern because he would go on and on about having s-e-x
> >with
> > >>other women as he was married (now divorce).
> > >
> > > He always spoke about *wanting* to have sex with other
>women,
> >but
> > > the whole key to the riff was that he never did.
> > >
> > > ___/
> > > /
> > > __/
> > > /
> > > ____/
> > > Ed Leafe<snip>
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Pete
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]


 
©2004 Pete Theisen
<-- Prior Message New Search Next Message -->