on 1/31/04 7:39 PM, Robert Brenstein at rjb .at. rz D.O.T uni-potsdam.de wrote:
>>> -- option to have automatic time stamping of all or specific fields
>>> in a baseobject (updated only when content changes)
>>
>> Yes, we have add DB.Clocks(), and TIMESTAMP field.
>
> Is the TIMESTAMP an internal field (handled automatically by kernel)
> or it is a field for us to use explicitely? Ideally, a field would
> have a property "timestamp" settable through Field_SetFlag() and then
> we have a call Field_GetTimestamp() to find the current value. It
> should also be properly handled through SQL, so we can easily find
> records with fields that were modified after specific timestamp.
This is new field type.
Actually it is ULLONG.
It looks we have not yet polish this field type.
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan@paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com
To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Valentina mailing list
Valentina .at. lists D.O.T macserve.net
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
©2004 Ruslan Zasukhin |
