Chuck:
I suppose it would have been a help if I had added a disclaimer that I
do not endorse vigilantism. The rule of law has to prevail. All I
wanted to do was point out the fallacy of the comparison Andy was
making. If we are going to have a discussion it should be kept as
intellectually honest as possible. No name calling, no obviously
dubious arguments or statements, etc. etc.
Scott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: profox-bounces AT leafe .DO.T com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Chuck
> Urwiler
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:20 AM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Let there be no doubt, these people are savages
>
> Scott,
>
> And the people who want it both ways when it comes to killing the
> doctors that perform abortions is equally absurd. I'm sorry, let's not
> forget that this is a choice being made by the person who is having
the
> abortion - this is not a choice that the doctor is making for the
> patient.
>
> If doctors don't agree with abortions, then they shouldn't provide
them.
> They do NOT deserve to die for performing them. If they can live with
> the fact that they are performing abortions, so be it. I thought we
were
> all supposed to not judge others, but instead to let God judge people.
>
> If you really feel it's "vigilantism" to go and kill someone for
> performing an abortion, I have a real problem with that. Feeling
> strongly about something does not grant someone the power to decide
> whether that person lives or not.
>
> -Chuck
>
©2003 Scott Ramey |
