Did either of you see the Barbara Walters interview of Hillary Clinton =
last Sunday? Barbara Walters asked Hillary Clinton if the impeachment =
attempt of President Clinton was the result of a right wing conspiracy. =
Her answer was, and I paraphrase:=20
There were many attempts to find some wrong that President Clinton had =
done that was serious enough to warrant impeachment. This included =
constant investigations by special committees into at least two sex =
scandals prior to the Monica L. fiasco. Also there was a long =
investigation into Clinton's involvement in the White Water Investment =
Project when he was Governor of Arkansas. Also Hillary's conduct was =
investigate concerning her involvement as an attorney working for a =
Arkansas Law Firm as to her interests in many investments. In the end, =
no wrongdoing was found. All of the constant investigation, allegation, =
innuendo, insinuations, etc where found to be groundless, but it =
bankrupt the Clinton's because of Attorney fees.=20
Hillary said she did not consider it a conspiracy, because everything =
was done out in the open, but it was a very well organized and financed =
right wing movement that was responsible.=20
LelandJ
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Michael Madigan=20
To: ProFox Email List=20
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Tony Small's Tax Cut Estimator
I believe you are not using the correct terminology. It is not a
"right-wing cabal" but rather the prefered term is
"vast-right-wing conspiracy".=20
--- Chet Gardiner <chetdude At pacbell .D.O.T net> wrote:
> And the N.Y. times, Common Dreams, ABC News, the Guardian, The
> London Times,
> BBC, the Economist, Washington Post, PBS, NPR, Bush press
> conferences, etc. etc.
> etc.
>=20
> The post you cite was information that was also published in
> the Fort
> Bend/Southwest Star
> (http://www.freepressinternational.com/fortbendstar.html)
> noting that a suit for sexual harrassment was filed against
> the shrub. This is
> fact. There HAS been a lawsuit filed.
>=20
> If it had been against Clinton, the right-wing cabal would have
> been sure that
> there'd be an independent council with 20 million dollars
> investigating it but
> since it's Bush the Lesser, not a peep. Can you say
> double-standard children.
>=20
> Chet
>=20
>=20
> PS: Thanks to the shrub's recession, I get $0.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: "Michael Madigan" <mmadi10699@yahoo.com>
> To: "ProFox Email List" <profox At leafe .D.O.T com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [OT] Tony Small's Tax Cut Estimator
>=20
>=20
> > Yeah chet, I seem to remember you quoting Pravda:)
> >
> > http://leafe.com/archives/showMsg/86413
> >
> > --- Chet Gardiner <chetdude@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > Here are some of his sources:
> > >
> > > http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html
> > >
> > > http://www.freerepublic.com/
> > >
> > > and for the "left wing" point of view:
> > >
> > > http://www.foxnews.com/oreilly/
> > >
> > >
> >
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > "I triple guarantee you, there are no American soldiers in
> Baghdad." Muhammed
> Saeed al-Sahaf (Baghdad Bob)
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]
©2003 Leland F. Jackson, CPA |
