-----Original Message-----
From: Testi, Anthony L (UseTemp) [mailto:anthony.testi-eds (at) eds .D.O.T com]=20
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 2:42 PM
>( I'm being serious here ) There is a story going around that someone
asked
>you a question about doing such and such to VFP and figured it would be
>easy
>because all one would need to do is subclass such and such. The answer
>attributed to you ( or maybe it was Calvin ) was "What makes you think
that
>there is any OOP in VFP?"
If it was Calvin, it's not uncommon for smart ass remarks to leave his
lips. But even so, it was just a question, right? Doesn't mean it's
*not* OOP.
If it were me, I've probably been misquoted. It's very likely that
someone asked about (for example) the 2Gb limit. Most of that engine
code was written ages ago, and is in C. So more than likely I said
something like, "what makes you think that section of the VFP code base
is OOP?"
Mike Stewart
©2003 Mike Stewart |
