Mike,
( I'm being serious here ) There is a story going around that someone asked
you a question about doing such and such to VFP and figured it would be easy
because all one would need to do is subclass such and such. The answer
attributed to you ( or maybe it was Calvin ) was "What makes you think that
there is any OOP in VFP?" Hence some people, myself included, have gotten
the idea in our heads ( in my case my very small head ) that VFP has little
if any real OOP under the hood.
I really did not care if VFP was built on OOP or not, it works well and
allows me to do good OOPing, which is what I want!
I assume you are going to dispel the above 'myth' then?
Anthony L. Testi
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Stewart [mailto:mikestew (at) microsoft DOT com]
Wrong on both. I am curious as to how someone came to that conclusion.
It's not like anyone outside of MSFT has the source code.
Mike Stewart
©2003 Testi, Anthony L (UseTemp) |
