The archives are down when I was checking earlier(no time to try =
again now), but I'm 100% confident the C/C++ point was mentioned here in =
regards to the MSVCR70.dll. It wasn't anyone at MS that made the =
statement, making it my mistake to regurgitate this "fact".=20
--=20
Derek
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testi, Anthony L (UseTemp) [mailto:anthony.testi-eds .at. eds .DO.T com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 5:18 PM
> To: 'profox@leafe.com'
> Subject: RE: FoxPro 8.0 Capacities
>=20
>=20
> I'm sure Mike's point was that "It was not pointed out here=20
> before". <g>
> Anthony
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derek J. Kalweit [mailto:dkalweit .at. sensiblesoftware .DO.T com]
>=20
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Derek J. Kalweit [mailto:dkalweit@sensiblesoftware.com]=20
> >=20
> > > It's been pointed out here before that VFP is written in=20
> straight C,
> > so >it's entirely procedural code-- no object orientation=20
> whatsoever.
> >=20
> > Wrong.
> >=20
> > Mike Stewart
>=20
> Wrong on it being straight C, or wrong on no object orientation?
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
[excessive quoting removed by server]
©2003 Derek J. Kalweit |
