I thought that would be the answer. I would guess they would just about
re-write most of the code.
thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: profox-admin At leafe .DO.T com [mailto:profox-admin@leafe.com]On Behalf Of
Testi, Anthony L (UseTemp)
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 6:12 PM
To: 'profox At leafe .DO.T com'
Subject: RE: FoxPro 8.0 Capacities
No!
And it never will IMO, for both technical and MS business reasons. ( e.g.
why pay a lot more for SQL Server if VFP can work with large data sets? To
answer my own question SQL Server still bets VFP in the areas of security,
Online backups, multi-user, etc. So even if VFP did break the 2 gig barrier
there would be plenty of reasons to still move to SQL server. )
Anthony
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Thompson [mailto:calpoly@cox.net]
I have hear this many times so I will ask those in the know.
Since I don't have VFP 8.0 or 7.0 I will have to ask, has VFP 7.0 or 8.0
broken the the 2 gb free table file limit?
TIA
[excessive quoting removed by server]
©2003 Dan Thompson |
