Yes, you can do that.
<i><font color="#663300">Thank for you guidelines. But is it possible to start developing in CCB like we would do in CB61 and then when I get the hang of things use CCB to the fullest.
Thanks again
<i><font color="#663300">It really depends on your needs. COMCodebook is COM based and therefore easier to split into multiple physical tiers. It uses ADO to pass data and provides a class to convert the ADO Record Set to/from Fox cursors. However, don't have to do that. You can bind the UI controls directly to the RS. It's also easier change the UI in CCB. If you need a web interface, you can do it.
I found COMCodebook easier to understand and faster to get up to speed when compared to Codebook. This may not be the same for you as I already had a solid understanding of COM and n-tier development. I have some articles on COM development on my web site (www.craigberntson.com) and part 1 of a series in the May FoxTalk if you need some help there. I will also have a CCB article on my website in the next few days.
<i><font color="#663300">Im as you all probably know by know am a newbie and I doing the learning curve. I will be developing mostly business appliactions for Accounting, Inventory, etc. Which is the more suitable of the two ?
</font></i>
</font></i>
</font></i>
--------
Craig Berntson
©2001 Craig Berntson |
