on 11/29/02 8:26 PM, Robert Brenstein at rjb .AT. rz .DOT uni-potsdam.de wrote:
> Good news? May be yes, may be no. Confusing.
>
> I think you missed the meaning of the first paragraph above:
>
> diagnose with Vapp 1.9.6 says that the db is fine even though users got 351's.
>
> Is it possible that the conversion from 1.8.10 to 1.9.6 fixes
> something? Is it possible that 351 is reported falsely?
Aha, so 351 is "corrupted VarChar" !
Robert, again, clarify my questions in prev letter !
In 1.9.5 and 1.9.6 we have had no problems with VarChar.
You better create FRESH db by LoadDump in 1.9.6.
Do not use old db.
And it must go away.
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan@paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com
To subscribe to the Valentina mail list
send a letter to valentina-on .AT. lists .DOT macserve.net
-------------------------------------------------------------
©2002 Ruslan Zasukhin |
