RE: [NF] Windows Home Server

Author: Leland F. Jackson

Posted: 2009-03-03 at 13:06:35

Linux is probably a popular OS for NAS(s), because the ext2 and ext3

file systems are rock solid, fast, and free, which avoid problems of

working with proprietary OS(s) like windows. Also Linux supports lots

of different type of file systems, depending on what's been built into

the kernel, and the Linux SAMBA and NFS features are good for

networking.

I think I have more options going with a Linux computer, but a NAS would

be more straight forward, and have everything built in and ready to go.

Regards,

LelandJ

On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 09:24 +0000, Adam Buckland wrote:

> Have to agree with Leland, I've been using Twonky on my NAS servers and

> on a home server for the last four years, it's fast and reliable though

> if you do have a lot of media (over about 2,000 albums), you will need

> to increase the cache (one line edit in the config file).

>

> It works well on my NAS's which are easier and cheaper to deploy and run

> than separate Linux boxes...

>

> I use Synology DS205 and ICYBOX's, both reliable, both run on Linux

> though the Synology is more flexible in that you can add mail server

> programs etc, it is a lot more expensive.

>

>

> Adam.

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On

> Behalf Of Leland F. Jackson

> Sent: 27 February 2009 16:10

> To: ProFox Email List

> Subject: RE: [NF] Windows Home Server

>

> I'm running Fedora as my primary OS, which is hosting VMware. I run

> windows XP Pro as a guest OS in a Linux VMware Virtual Machine. I gave

> TVersity a try as a mediaserver, but wasn't really happy with it,

> because it only runs under windows. After some looking around, I

> discovered TwonkyMedia, which is based on the open source Myth TV

> project.

>

> TwonkyMedia enables me to share all my Music, Pictures and Videos

> throughout the house. It is available for many different platforms and

> inter-works with a large variety of client devices including XBox 360

> and sony's PS3. I Have PS3. TwonkyMedia needs fewer resources and is

> faster than other UPnP Media Servers, but still provides more features

> to help users enjoy large media collections. With TwonkyMedia there is

> no need for a special NAS box. All I need to do is add hard drives to

> the Linux computer via EIDE, SATA, USB, or Firewire. TwonkyMedia is not

> free, but is a good value based on price.

>

> TwonkyMedia runs as a service under Linux, is accessible to computers in

> the local network via a web browser over a designated port, or with a

> properly configured firewall, is accessible over the internet.

>

> http://www.twonkymedia.com/

>

> Regards,

>

> LelandJ

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 07:47 +0000, Adam Buckland wrote:

> > Short and simple... it's a crock...

> >

> > It's basically cut down version of WS2K8 with media streaming and a

> > backup program for your pc's.

> >

> > You can only administer it via it's bespoke GUI.

> >

> > Buy a decent NAS (Say like an ICYBOX or a Synology diskstation) stick

> in

> > 2 * 1TB drives and mirror them then take the $300 you've saved and go

> > for a great meal....

> >

> > If you've got a spare PC I'm sure there is a evaluation download

> > available, it's in the action pack otherwise, I tried it and went down

> > the NAS route with 750 GB of data at home.

> >

> >

> >

> > Adam.

> >

> >

> >

> > -----Original Message-----

> > From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On

> > Behalf Of Steve Ellenoff

> > Sent: 26 February 2009 18:27

> > To: profox@leafe.com

> > Subject: [NF] Windows Home Server

> >

> > Anyone have any real world experience with this? I just stumbled

> > across it yesterday and it sounds great for managing large amounts of

> > data (but I'm skeptical because MS can make anything sound better than

> > it is).

> >

> >

[excessive quoting removed by server]

©2009 Leland F. Jackson